OK, O.K., or Okay?

Is “OK” properly written as initials or as a word? What does it mean?

You’ve probably heard at some point that the word “okay” is derived from the initials “O.K.,” which can be traced back to Martin Van Buren’s nickname, “Old Kinderhook.” (Kinderhook was Van Buren’s birthplace in New York, as well as where he retired.) There’s no question that “O.K.” was used in the 1840 presidential campaign, but it seems clear to me that the use of “o.k.” originated earlier. Exactly when, though, is up for dispute. Unfortunately, a new book doesn’t seem to add much understanding about the word’s origin.

In addition to Van Buren, Andrew Jackson has been attached to the origin of this word as well. Supposedly, he spelled “all correct” as “Oll Korrect,” which became “O.K.” He also reportedly used the initials in a 1790 court record, in which he wrote, “Andrew Jackson, Esq., proved a bill of sale from Hugh McGary to Gasper [Kasper] Mansker for a negro man, which was O.K.” (p. 252). A perusal of the volume of Jackson’s legal papers and the first volume of the Papers of Andrew Jackson doesn’t reveal a mention of this usage, but that doesn’t necessarily mean anything, since they don’t address every mention of Jackson in the historical record. A quick scan of several modern Jackson biographies also didn’t turn up a reference to the alleged court record.

Even more interesting is the claim that “O.K.” is derived from the Ulster Scots. Unfortunately, the source for this nugget is Wikipedia, and, wouldn’t you know it, there’s no citation  provided for the claim.

I would be interested in hearing from readers who might know a bit more about this alleged court record or the Ulster Scots theory mentioned by Wikipedia. It’s really just trivia, but the Slate book review linked above piqued my curiosity, and I need something to do while my students sweat through a final exam today.

Advertisements

2 Replies to “OK, O.K., or Okay?”

    1. Hmm. That’s a little more context than what I linked.

      I wonder if my Native American friends and experts on the CU faculty (or elsewhere) have any insight into this Native American connection. It seems plausible, but plausibility isn’t causality.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s